編按：在審判過程中，雖然這些刑求錄影帶在法庭上播出，但是一般社會大眾並沒有機會看到。請看完這些短片，然後做出你的判斷：邱和順有沒有被刑求？（待續...）
台北市刑大員警駕車對話（兩名台北市刑大刑警駕車前往柯洪玉蘭案勘驗現場，談話內容述及他們重打了邱和順，迫使其翻供。）
Taipei
City Criminal department high officials’ conversation while driving
While
driving to the scene of the Ke Hong Yu Lan inquest, the two officers discuss
the beating given to Chiou He-shun, which forced him to change his confession.
共同被告之偵訊錄影（邱和順同案被告作筆錄時，被訊問人站立起身，可見其下半身僅著內褲，辯護律師團認為這是曾遭脫褲子、刑求電擊下體的證明。當時是冬天。）
Co-defendants’
interrogation film
When the
co-defendants were giving their accounts of the Chiou He-shun case to the
police, those being interrogated are standing, and we can see that they are
only wearing underpants. The defense lawyer group belief that this is proof of
torture: stripping the defendants’ clothing, and applying electric shocks to
the lower parts of their bodies. At the time, it was winter.
沒有留言:
張貼留言